Saturday, October 13, 2018

A Review of If It Bleeds


If It Bleeds by Isabelle Pauwels is a film that mocks Mixed Martial Arts. This is not a sport I know much about so it was a little hard to understand the references, but the film was still comedic and I can see how it relates to other sports entertainment that I’ve seen as well.
There are many fictional characters who represent fighters, reporters, promoters, and Athletic Commission members. Some of the fictional characters are represented by objects instead of actors. All of the fights feel very theatrical or representational and are barely recognizable as fights. The beginning of the film shows bricks on the floor and balloons popping and falling onto them with commentary about the U.S. and “f*cking your wife”. The first fighter you are introduced to has been retired but is being brought back for a fight and answers every question with “5th amendment”. Many of the characters say things that are supposed to be inspirational but don’t quite work, like the female fighter who says her arms are real and girls shouldn’t need to photoshop their arms, and one of the female fighters represented by objects (I think she may have been a pink wig and a water bottle) says that she is not perfect but she wins because she chooses to. Another fighter takes drugs and characters are upset when he can’t fight because he had ‘a little cocaine’. The reporters who interview the fighters ask very cliche questions (one of them clearly states that he is asking a question as though it has never been asked before) and the fighters respond mostly as you would expect them to, although everything in this film manages to be a little odd and unexpected. Different images and pieces of video flash briefly over parts of the screen, often showing tinsel and sparkles. One of the fighters is embodied by his cowboy hat and says crude things and is surrounded by beer cans. A fight between a guy with a fake Irish accent and the fighter returning from retirement ends with the old fighter putting lipstick on his opponent’s lips. At one point the woman who is asking legal questions takes off her wig and becomes a some sort of commentator dressed in leather who flips her hair dramatically and seems to direct the fight (she asks someone to throw a shoe and asks people to repeat lines, and suggests that a fighter cries on screen). Whenever someone does something admirable or inspirational, there are black gloves clapping which I suppose must represent the audience. The whole time, you feel like the characters are conscious of being filmed and everything is an act.
This film makes WWA seem very focused on the media and appealing to their audiences in any way possible. The culture that is promoted feels similar to that of American football, where stereotypically masculine traits are encouraged, although this sport also tries to include anything that seems “badass” like talking about winning, sex, and tattoos. I know it’s not as fake as the professional wrestling industry, but the movie isn’t really focusing on the fighting itself. It’s focusing on what goes on around the fighting. The fighters seem pitted against each other and made to fit into stereotypes. I think you could still be a fan of WWA as a sport and enjoy watching it but agree that some parts are ridiculous. I also liked the creative use of cheap materials like tinsel, colorful beer cans, balloons, and many everyday objects which makes it feel like the sport is being dressed up as something flashier than it is. Afterwards I looked up MMA and watched some videos of it and now I feel like I’ve been exposed to a cultural phenomenon I knew little about.

7 comments:

  1. Overall the review is great cause I didn't see the film but after I read your review I got to know about the main idea of the film. The film is artful in the way that not directly depicting the fighting itself but what goes on around the fighting, which is attracting me the most. After all based on your review I consider the film to be a fun and meaningful one, so I would like to learn more about this film in the future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you want to check it out, the first 48 seconds are shown here (and the whole movie is supposed to be posted at some point): https://www.isabellepauwels.com/video-links/. It was definitely and entertaining critique.

      Delete
  2. I really like the tie between the WWA culture and the culture of American Football. It is interesting to think, however, what is the difference between American Football and sports like MMA that prevents American Football from developing those crazy characters that the UFC is so rapidly developing. You are definitely right by stating that the whole film was centered around the pre and post-fighting fallout rather than the fighting itself. It is in these parts of the industry that these chaotic and absurd moments happen and I think that is what the creator is really going for here, a representation of the ridiculousness that is the crazy characters that are forming in an industry that was originally meant to be the purest form of combat entertainment. The industry as a whole has been soiled as it becomes a collective of larger than life characters each acting their way to the top.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's nice to hear the perspective of someone who seems to know more about the industry than I do. It is unfortunate that mixed martial artists have to be part of this "pageant" if they want to be competitive. The film definitely didn't feel really critical of the sport as a whole, since clearly the artist must have known something about the topic to begin with and was able to cite many examples of what she was mocking at the end. I wish Isabelle Pauwels had been able to attend her premiere (she was stuck at the border for some reason) and talk more about her views of the sport.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with your opening paragraph, in which you state, “This is not a sport I know much about so it was a little hard to understand the references, but the film was still comedic and I can see how it relates to other sports entertainment that I’ve seen as well.” I would even say that this film relates to fame itself. I myself am not familiar with sports or sports entertainment in general, though I still found the film to be meaningful. I further agree with you when you say, “this film makes [MMA] seem very focused on the media and appealing to their audiences in any way possible” and “the fighters…[are] made to fit into stereotypes.” These concepts relate to the film being representational of celebrities as a whole. The media is known to create a distortion of the truth, thus creating as much drama as possible. It can make us wonder what is real and what isn’t. Of course, does the validity of the gossip matter? Or is the sport itself the only thing that matters? Celebrities often become famous for their talents (such as fighting), yet the public seems to place more importance on the drama which surrounds them. In this way, a celebrity fighter’s legacy is not necessarily the talent they possess. Rather, the film illustrates that it consists mainly of tabloid headlines and online gossip. Perhaps the media would have their tombstones read things like, "[Celebrity fighter] spotted having a bad hair day--pics inside!" and "[Celebrity fighter] and [other celebrity] split! Scroll down for more details."

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think you hit the nail right on the head with your conclusion that the film illustrates WWA’s focus on media and audiences rather than actual fighting. I think in particular, the fact that the fight scenes are hardly shown, but when they are, the fights are quick, fake, and underwhelming. I found myself laughing out loud after the Brick character was knocked over later on in the film. I think this is an example of Pauwels’ very artful navigation of the topic she is trying to discuss. Fights in real life are overly hyped up and publicized, only for them to be quick, dramatic, (possibly fake), and overall underwhelming.
    I think I disagree with your opinion on the more visual and editorial aspects of the film. Your review seems to be confused as to why the film was so choppy and what the symbolism really signified. While I’m not well-versed in the world of MMA fighting either, and some of the symbolism was lost on me as well, I enjoyed a lot of the aesthetic qualities of the film at face-value. In particular, I loved the audio tracks of soda cans being opened and poured. And while I agree with you that the nature of the editing was jarring in the beginning of the film, I grew to greatly enjoy it as it went on when I adjusted to the rhythm of it.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.