The Formosa Quartet’s performance on Thursday night was an
excellent opening to EMPAC’s 10-year celebration. The Quartet has been praised
worldwide for performing classical music, playing experimental and alternative pieces,
and, most notably, resurrecting and reinventing traditional Taiwanese music. In
this installation, the Formosa Quartet sought to showcase the artistic
significance of EMPAC by performing different musical pieces in four separate venues
within EMPAC. What the Quartet did exceptionally well—in addition to playing
their instruments with astounding precision and elegance—was create a
completely unique experience with every new venue, ultimately displaying the impressive
diversity of EMPAC.
The performance began in the concert hall. We were ushered into the auditorium and were
instructed to sit on the stage, facing outwards towards the seats in the
auditorium. The lights dimmed and the musicians were illuminated behind their
music stands; they were standing at the very back of the top balcony. The Quartet
began playing the second movement Joseph Haydn’s String Quartet in E-flat Major, a melodic, classical piece. Being
forced to look upwards to see the musicians created an aura of regality, which
at times was almost heavenly.
The Quartet ended their piece and silently exited the
theater and soon we exited too. We entered Studio 1, one of EMPAC’s black boxes.
Inside we found the Quartet, seated facing each other in the center of the room;
the audience members filled in seats in concentric circles around the
musicians. They looked at one another for a moment, and then simultaneously the
struck sharp, atonal, rhythmic notes of Bela Bartok’s String Quartet No. 4 on their instruments. It was jarring at first,
but soon the pulsing beat drew us in and we felt ourselves swirling around the
music.
Next, we found ourselves in Studio 2, and this time each
musician was seated at different corners of the room. It was our turn to sit in
the middle, and we faced outward. The music that followed was a contemporary
piece. The music combined with the cratered white tiles on the walls made me
think of a moonscape. Depending on which seat you chose upon entering, you could
only see one or two of the musicians. This made it so that the audience members
could listen to the distinct sounds the instruments and the melodies they each
played. It was a stark contrast to the concentric, swirling, pulsing feeling we
had in the last room. Instead this room felt independent and otherworldly.
The next venue provided a direct contrast to the first one
we visited. In EMPAC’s theater, the curtain on the stage was drawn and the Quartet
was nowhere to be seen. Once the house lights were dimmed, bright red light emanated
from the orchestra bit and it became clear that our musicians would be
performing from below this time. The first venue was angelic, and the melody
drew us upwards towards the music. In this theater, however, the music pulled
us down. Cascading notes and foreboding hums seemed to warn us of what we would
find if we ventured down below. The piece ended with plucked strings that
sounded like pebbles that had been dropped into the cavern.
For the last portion of the performance, we returned to the Concert
Hall. The musicians were seated on stage this time, and we sat in the front few
rows. The Quartet played Lei Liang’s Song
Recollections, which was distinctly inspired by Taiwanese culture and music.
It was easy to imagine the landscape and community of Taiwan as intended by
Liang and the Quartet when listening to the sections of cheerful refrains, choral
plucking, and strong, steady notes.
The Formosa Quartet created what can be described as five different
“acoustical auras.” Each was starkly different than the other, some directly contrasted
each other, and some took to experiencing the music simply from a different
angle. All of these experiences were tied together by the Quartet’s undeniable
talent, winning them a standing ovation at the end of the performance and
sparking excitement for the rest of EMPAC’s celebration.
It is interesting that you name the third piece performed in Studio 2 as a contemporary one, when it is in fact the oldest of the five presented, composed by Bach between 1740 and 1750. The dynamic and innovative uses of space certainly brought new life to the older pieces and they felt right at home next to recent compositions from the last five years.
ReplyDeleteI like the contrast you draw between the first and fourth parts of the performance, I too noticed a heavenly and hellish quality in each piece respectively. The variety of techniques used and sounds produced in the fourth piece certainly added to the kind of surreal, otherworldly effect brought on by the use of light.
I’m glad you used the term “otherworldly” to describe the fourth performance. I used the term to describe the third performance, but you’ve prompted me to acknowledge the “otherworldliness” of the concert as a whole. While I addressed the contrasts between performances, and I described each of them, I did not give the artists enough credit for each “world” they created. Not only did the musicians create atmospheres that exemplified the variety of EMPAC (as the performance was intended to) but it also showed the importance of atmosphere when listening to a piece of music. This leads me to wonder if the fourth performance in the orchestra pit would’ve been different if the lighting had been blue instead of red, or if the Bartok piece had been played in the concert hall instead of the studio.
DeleteI find it interesting the way that you described the performance in the theater. In retrospect the booming sound created from the performers being in the orchestra pit did create the illusion of being in a larger room. The darkness also added to this feeling, making it seem as if there was more space to the room than what could be seen. This performance by far had the greatest atmosphere and truly swept me away into another realm of thought. I think these reasons contribute to it being my favorite performance of the event.
ReplyDelete